Sox Testing
This skill assists with SOX compliance workflows by generating sample selections, creating testing workpapers, documenting control assessments, and providing...
Install
npx promptshop add sox-testingDetails
What This Skill Does
This skill assists with SOX compliance workflows by generating sample selections, creating testing workpapers, documenting control assessments, and providing testing templates for SOX 404 internal controls over financial reporting. It is designed for compliance teams and financial professionals involved in internal controls testing.
When to Use
- Generate testing workpapers for revenue recognition controls.
- Document control assessments for procure-to-pay processes.
- Create testing templates for payroll processing controls.
- Test IT general controls (ITGC) related to access and change management.
- Assess entity-level controls and monitoring activities.
- Evaluate journal entry processing controls.
Key Features
- Generates sample selections for SOX compliance testing.
- Creates testing workpapers for various control areas.
- Documents control assessments to support audit documentation.
- Provides testing templates for SOX 404 internal controls.
- Supports testing for revenue, procurement, payroll, and other key areas.
- Helps identify key controls based on the control area.
Manual Installation
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Important: This command assists with SOX compliance workflows but does not provide audit or legal advice. All testing workpapers and assessments should be reviewed by qualified financial professionals before use in audit documentation.
Generate sample selections, create testing workpapers, document control assessments, and provide testing templates for SOX 404 internal controls over financial reporting.
Usage
/sox <control-area> <period>
Arguments
control-area — The control area to test:
- revenue-recognition — Revenue cycle controls (order-to-cash)
- procure-to-pay or p2p — Procurement and AP controls (purchase-to-pay)
- payroll — Payroll processing and compensation controls
- financial-close — Period-end close and reporting controls
- treasury — Cash management and treasury controls
- fixed-assets — Capital asset lifecycle controls
- inventory — Inventory valuation and management controls
- itgc — IT general controls (access, change management, operations)
- entity-level — Entity-level and monitoring controls
- journal-entries — Journal entry processing controls
- Any specific control ID or name period — The testing period (e.g., 2024-Q4, 2024, 2024-H2)
Workflow
1. Identify Controls to Test
- Based on the control area, identify the key controls.
- Present the control matrix:
| Control # | Control Description | Type | Frequency | Key/Non-Key | Risk | Assertion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ID] | [Description] | Manual/Automated/IT-Dependent | Daily/Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly/Annual | Key | High/Medium/Low | [CEAVOP] |
Control types: Automated: System-enforced controls with no manual intervention Manual: Controls performed by personnel with judgment IT-dependent manual: Manual controls that rely on system-generated data
Assertions (CEAVOP): Completeness — All transactions are recorded Existence/Occurrence — Transactions actually occurred Accuracy — Amounts are correctly recorded Valuation — Assets/liabilities are properly valued Obligations/Rights — Entity has rights to assets, obligations for liabilities Presentation/Disclosure — Properly classified and disclosed
2. Determine Sample Size
Calculate sample sizes based on control frequency and risk:
| Control Frequency | Population Size (approx.) | Recommended Sample |
|---|---|---|
| Annual | 1 | 1 (test the instance) |
| Quarterly | 4 | 2 |
| Monthly | 12 | 2-4 (based on risk) |
| Weekly | 52 | 5-15 (based on risk) |
| Daily | ~250 | 20-40 (based on risk) |
| Per-transaction | Varies | 25-60 (based on risk and volume) |
Adjust for: Risk level: Higher risk controls require larger samples Prior year results: Controls with prior deficiencies need larger samples Reliance: Controls relied upon by external auditors may need larger samples
3. Generate Sample Selection
Select samples from the population using the appropriate method:
Random selection (default for transaction-level controls): Generate random numbers to select specific items from the population Ensure coverage across the full period
Systematic selection (for periodic controls): Select items at fixed intervals with a random start point Ensure representation across all sub-periods
Targeted selection (supplement to random, for risk-based testing): Select items with specific risk characteristics (high dollar, unusual, period-end) Document rationale for targeted selections
Present the sample:
SAMPLE SELECTION Control: [Control ID] — [Description] Period: [Testing period] Population: [Count] items, $[Total value] Sample size: [N] items Selection method: [Random/Systematic/Targeted]
| Sample # | Transaction Date | Reference/ID | Amount | Selection Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Date] | [Ref] | $X,XXX | Random |
| 2 | [Date] | [Ref] | $X,XXX | Random |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
4. Create Testing Workpaper
Generate a testing template for each control:
SOX CONTROL TESTING WORKPAPER
Control #: [ID] Control Description: [Full description of the control activity] Control Owner: [Role/title — to be filled by tester] Control Type: [Manual/Automated/IT-Dependent Manual] Frequency: [How often the control operates] Key Control: [Yes/No] Relevant Assertion(s): [CEAVOP] Testing Period: [Period]
TEST OBJECTIVE: To determine whether [control description] operated effectively throughout the testing period.
TEST PROCEDURES: [Step 1 — What to inspect, examine, or re-perform] [Step 2 — What evidence to obtain] [Step 3 — What to compare or verify] [Step 4 — How to evaluate completeness of performance] [Step 5 — How to assess timeliness of performance]
EXPECTED EVIDENCE: [Document type 1 — e.g., signed approval form] [Document type 2 — e.g., system screenshot showing review] [Document type 3 — e.g., reconciliation with preparer sign-off]
TEST RESULTS:
| Sample # | Ref | Procedure 1 | Procedure 2 | Procedure 3 | Result | Exception? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pass/Fail | Pass/Fail | Pass/Fail | Pass/Fail | Y/N | ||
| 2 | Pass/Fail | Pass/Fail | Pass/Fail | Pass/Fail | Y/N |
EXCEPTIONS NOTED:
| Sample # | Exception Description | Root Cause | Compensating Control | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONCLUSION: [ ] Effective — Control operated effectively with no exceptions [ ] Effective with exceptions — Control operated effectively; exceptions are isolated [ ] Deficiency — Control did not operate effectively [ ] Significant Deficiency — Deficiency is more than inconsequential [ ] Material Weakness — Reasonable possibility of material misstatement not prevented/detected
Tested by: ________________ Date: ________ Reviewed by: _______________ Date: ________
5. Provide Common Control Templates
Based on the control area, provide pre-built test step templates:
Revenue Recognition: Verify sales order approval and authorization Confirm delivery/performance evidence Test revenue recognition timing against contract terms Verify pricing acc