Audit Support

What This Skill Does

This skill assists with SOX 404 compliance workflows by providing guidance on control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. It's designed for financial professionals involved in internal control assessments. The skill helps in creating and evaluating effective internal controls and documentation for audits.

When to Use

• Identify significant accounts and relevant assertions.
• Evaluate the risk of material misstatement.
• Document controls that address each risk.
• Test the design and operating effectiveness of key controls.
• Assess control deficiencies and their severity.
• Document the assessment and any material weaknesses.

Key Features

• Provides guidance on SOX 404 control testing methodology.
• Offers sample selection approaches for testing.
• Explains testing documentation standards.
• Assists with control deficiency classification.
• Covers common control types.
• Helps identify significant accounts and relevant assertions.

## SOX 404 Control Testing Methodology

Overview

SOX Section 404 requires management to assess the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR). This involves:

Scoping: Identify significant accounts and relevant assertions Risk assessment: Evaluate the risk of material misstatement for each significant account Control identification: Document the controls that address each risk Testing: Test the design and operating effectiveness of key controls Evaluation: Assess whether any deficiencies exist and their severity Reporting: Document the assessment and any material weaknesses

Scoping Significant Accounts

An account is significant if there is more than a remote likelihood that it could contain a misstatement that is material (individually or in aggregate).

Quantitative factors: Account balance exceeds materiality threshold (typically 3-5% of a key benchmark) Transaction volume is high, increasing the risk of error Account is subject to significant estimates or judgment

Qualitative factors: Account involves complex accounting (revenue recognition, derivatives, pensions) Account is susceptible to fraud (cash, revenue, related-party transactions) Account has had prior misstatements or audit adjustments Account involves significant management judgment or estimates New account or significantly changed process

Relevant Assertions by Account Type

Design Effectiveness vs Operating Effectiveness

Design effectiveness: Is the control properly designed to prevent or detect a material misstatement in the relevant assertion? Evaluated through walkthroughs (trace a transaction end-to-end through the process) Confirm the control is placed at the right point in the process Confirm the control addresses the identified risk Performed at least annually, or when processes change

Operating effectiveness: Did the control actually operate as designed throughout the testing period? Evaluated through testing (inspection, observation, re-performance, inquiry) Requires sufficient sample sizes to support a conclusion Must cover the full period of reliance

Sample Selection Approaches

Random Selection

When to use: Default method for transaction-level controls with large populations.

Method: Define the population (all transactions subject to the control during the period) Number each item in the population sequentially Use a random number generator to select sample items Ensure no bias in selection (all items have equal probability)

Advantages: Statistically valid, defensible, no selection bias Disadvantages: May miss high-risk items, requires complete population listing

Targeted (Judgmental) Selection

When to use: Supplement to random selection for risk-based testing; primary method when population is small or highly varied.

Method: Identify items with specific risk characteristics:

• High dollar amount (above a defined threshold)
• Unusual or non-standard transactions
• Period-end transactions (cut-off risk)
• Related-party transactions
• Manual or override transactions
• New vendor/customer transactions Select items matching risk criteria Document rationale for each targeted selection

Advantages: Focuses on highest-risk items, efficient use of testing effort Disadvantages: Not statistically representative, may over-represent certain risks

Haphazard Selection

When to use: When random selection is impractical (no sequential population listing) and population is relatively homogeneous.

Method: Select items without any specific pattern or bias Ensure selections are spread across the full population period Avoid unconscious bias (don't always pick items at the top, round numbers, etc.)

Advantages: Simple, no technology required Disadvantages: Not statistically valid, susceptible to unconscious bias

Systematic Selection

When to use: When population is sequential and you want even coverage across the period.

Method: Calculate the sampling interval: Population size / Sample size Select a random starting point within the first interval Select every Nth item from the starting point

• Example: Population of 1,000, sample of 25 → interval of 40.
• Random start: item 17.
• Select items 17, 57, 97, 137,.

Advantages: Even coverage across population, simple to execute Disadvantages: Periodic patterns in the population could bias results

Sample Size Guidance

Factors increasing sample size: Higher inherent risk in the account/process Control is the sole control addressing a significant risk (no redundancy) Prior period control deficiency identified New control (not tested in prior periods) External auditor reliance on management testing

Testing Documentation Standards

Workpaper Requirements

Every control test should be documented with:

Control identification:

• Control number/ID
• Control description (what is done, by whom, how often)
• Control type (manual, automated, IT-dependent manual)
• Control frequency
• Risk and assertion addressed

Test design:

• Test objective (what you are trying to determine)
• Test procedures (step-by-step instructions)
• Expected evidence (what you expect to see if the control is effective)
• Sample selection methodology and rationale

Test execution:

• Populat